Posts

From Hierarchy Trauma to Ontological Stability

From Hierarchy Trauma to Ontological Stability For much of my adult life, I have reacted intensely to being belittled. The reaction is physical. Immediate. Often disproportionate to the present moment. For a long time, I thought this was about ego or external validation. It is not. It is about legitimacy. The Original Injury When a father repeatedly belittles a child — privately or publicly — the child’s nervous system learns: Visibility is dangerous. Emergence threatens authority. Status can be stripped. Legitimacy is negotiable. That becomes a survival template. Belittling later in life activates this imprint. The limbic system reads: Belittling → Positional Threat → Existential Danger. But that template is false. The Two Levels of Legitimacy There are two layers of legitimacy that cannot be erased. 1️⃣ Ontological Legitimacy Every human being is made in the image of God. Genesis 1:27 establishes intrinsic worth before achievement, before reputation, before hi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reversal or Repentance?

Reversal or Repentance? DARVO Patterns in the King James Bible Modern psychology has coined the acronym DARVO : Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. It describes a pattern in which someone confronted with wrongdoing refuses responsibility, shifts blame, and ultimately portrays themselves as the true victim. While the term is modern, the pattern is ancient. The King James Bible records it with remarkable clarity. From Eden to the kings of Israel to the trial of Christ, we see two opposing responses to exposure: Reversal — self-protective blame-shifting Repentance — ownership before God The difference between the two is moral courage. I. Saul and David: Reversal vs Repentance Saul: The Anatomy of Reversal 1 Samuel 15 (KJV) King Saul is commanded by God to utterly destroy Amalek. He does not. He spares King Agag and keeps the best livestock. When the prophet Samuel confronts him, Saul opens with confidence: “I have performed the commandment of the LORD.” (1 Samu...
Post a Comment
Read more

False Agency, Real Agency

False Agency, Real Agency Learning from What Almost Worked One of the most confusing parts of leaving an unhealthy attachment is this: It didn’t feel fake. It didn’t feel imagined. It felt real . That matters. If we dismiss the experience as delusion, we lose the most important information it contains. The state was real — the source was not sustainable In my own experience, a relationship produced something I had been missing: a sense of calm confidence, motivation, and agency. At the same time, it involved self-erasure and dependence. That paradox is the clue. The state itself was real — chemically, emotionally, somatically. But it was externally scaffolded . I did not possess it. I was borrowing it. Why externally scaffolded agency never lasts When agency is supplied by another person: it is fragile, it is conditional, it requires constant maintenance. The nervous system learns: “This state only exists if this relationship holds.” That creates: hyper-vig...
Post a Comment
Read more

Codependency as Limbic Bypass

Codependency as Limbic Bypass Accountability, Addiction, and Moral Responsibility For a long time, I understood codependency mainly in emotional terms: need, attachment, fear of abandonment, control. Those descriptions are not wrong — but they are incomplete. What finally clarified things for me was understanding the mechanism underneath the behaviour, and then asking a harder question: Where does moral responsibility actually begin? A limbic problem before it is a relational one At its core, codependency is not simply about personality or love. It is about how two nervous systems attempt to survive without healing . The limbic system is a prediction engine. It learns from experience what leads to safety, agency, or threat. When that system is injured early, people often discover workarounds . In certain relationships, those workarounds interlock. Two complementary bypasses In what we commonly call codependent dynamics, I now see two distinct — but mutually reinforcin...
Post a Comment
Read more

How People Accidentally Re-Strengthen Old Limbic Patterns

How People Accidentally Re-Strengthen Old Limbic Patterns (Even While Healing) One of the most frustrating experiences during healing is this: “I understand what’s happening. I’m doing the work. And yet it feels like the old reaction just got stronger.” That moment often leads to self-doubt or discouragement. But in many cases, what’s happening isn’t failure. It’s accidental re-reinforcement . A critical principle The limbic system strengthens patterns based on what predicts outcomes , not on your intentions. It doesn’t care whether you’re “working on yourself.” It cares about: what happens next what state you end up in whether danger or safety follows That means certain well-intentioned behaviours can quietly feed the very patterns you’re trying to weaken. 1. Over-monitoring the old pattern One of the most common mistakes is excessive checking: “Is it gone yet?” “Am I reacting again?” “Why is this still here?” This keeps attention locked on the old cue. Fro...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Old Limbic Patterns Don’t Disappear — and Why That’s Not a Failure

Why Old Limbic Patterns Don’t Disappear — and Why That’s Not a Failure One of the most confusing experiences during healing is this: “I understand what’s happening. I’ve done the work. And yet the old reaction still shows up.” That moment often triggers a quiet fear: “Does this mean nothing has really changed?” The answer is no. What it means is that you’re now encountering how the limbic system actually updates — not how we wish it would. The key misunderstanding Most people assume healing means replacement : old pattern gone new pattern installed trigger no longer exists That’s not how the limbic system works. The limbic system doesn’t delete survival patterns. It de-prioritises them. How limbic patterns really work The limbic system stores multiple overlapping pattern bundles , not a single rule. Each pattern includes: a cue (sensation, context, authority, internal state) an expected outcome (danger, safety, punishment, continuity) a response bias (app...
Post a Comment
Read more