Dot Classes in AMS

Dot Classes in AMS

Stable Knots in the Aether

In AMS, reality is not composed of particles.
It is composed of stable patterns.

To avoid importing old assumptions, we deliberately avoid terms like particle, charge, or field carrier.
Instead, we introduce a more neutral concept:

Dot classes — stable, localized knots in the aether substrate.

A “dot” is not a point.
It is a bounded region of structured constraint.

This article formalizes dot classes as a way of talking about matter, light, and forces without reintroducing particle ontology.

What a Dot Is (and Is Not)

A dot is:

  • Localized
  • Persistent
  • Structurally stable
  • Defined by constraint, not contents

A dot is not:

  • A particle
  • A solid object
  • A carrier of properties

A dot is a knot in the aether.

The Three Fundamental Constraints

All dots arise from combinations of three constraint types:

  1. Tension — resistance to separation
  2. Shear — differential phase displacement
  3. Torsion — rotational constraint

Different dot classes are distinguished by which constraints dominate and how they reinforce one another.

Primary Dot Classes

Class I — Propagating Dots (Light)

Dominant constraint: Tension
Secondary constraint: Minimal torsion
Shear: Negligible

Characteristics:

  • Non-localized
  • High propagation speed
  • No persistent internal structure

These dots do not remain in place.
They exist to move pattern.

Light, in AMS, is not an object — it is a traveling dot class.

Class II — Rotational Dots (Magnetism / Spin Structures)

Dominant constraint: Torsion
Secondary constraint: Tension
Shear: Low

Characteristics:

  • Stable handedness
  • Directional bias
  • Circular or helical structure

These dots encode rotation and orientation.
They do not travel freely, but they influence alignment around them.

Class III — Anchored Dots (Matter)

Dominant constraint: Combined torsion + shear
Secondary constraint: Tension

Characteristics:

  • Strong localization
  • Structural persistence
  • Resistance to deformation

Matter is not “solid stuff”.
It is a self-locking knot where constraints mutually reinforce.

Class IV — Gradient Dots (Gravity)

Dominant constraint: Tension gradient
Secondary constraint: Large-scale shear
Torsion: Minimal

Characteristics:

  • Non-local influence
  • Directional bias toward structure
  • No sharp boundaries

Gravity is not attraction.
It is a slope in the aether’s constraint density.

Composite Dots and Transitions

Most real phenomena are composite dot structures.

For example:

  • Electrical phenomena involve Class I dots interacting with Class II torsion patterns
  • Matter–light interaction is a coupling between Class III and Class I dots
  • Large systems exhibit nested dot hierarchies

Dots can transition between classes when constraint balance changes.

Why This Matters

Dot classes allow us to:

  • Describe reality without particles
  • Talk about stability without mass
  • Explain interaction without force carriers

They give us a grammar of structure instead of a catalogue of things.

Closing Thought

In AMS, nothing “exists” by being made of something.

Things exist because they hold together.

Dot classes are how we describe how they do that.

​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

AMS Guide Part 1 — Charter and Purpose

AMS Guide Part 1 — Charter and Purpose 1. What This Guide Is This document is a companion guide to the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) Ontology . Its purpose is to: explain the ontology in plain but accurate language reduce cognitive load for readers encountering the ideas for the first time provide intuition, metaphors, and narrative scaffolding allow readers to grasp what the ontology is doing without needing to adopt its formal vocabulary immediately The guide is not the ontology itself. It does not replace formal definitions or axioms. It exists to make them understandable . 2. Intended Audience Primary Audience Readers with: a genuine interest in science and how the physical world works some familiarity with scientific ideas and language curiosity rather than professional obligation A good mental model is: A regular reader of a BBC science magazine, Scientific American–style articles, or long-form popular science writing. This reader: is not a practi...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more