What I’ve Learned About Processing Trauma

What I’ve Learned About Processing Trauma

(or: Courage Starts the Journey — Safety Heals It)

For a long time, I thought healing trauma meant courage.

Facing what happened. Naming it. Telling the truth. Turning toward pain instead of running from it.

And in an important sense, that’s true. Courage is essential — especially at the beginning. Without courage, healing never starts. You stay fragmented, defensive, or dependent on other people to regulate you. That’s how chaos persists, and it’s how some people end up externalising their inner disorder at other people’s expense.

So let me be clear from the outset:

Courage matters.

But what I’ve learned — slowly, and not without cost — is that courage alone does not heal trauma.

Courage opens the door.
What heals trauma is safety and reliability.

The question I’d never asked

Here’s the question I’d somehow never consciously asked before:

What actually makes it safe to feel hurt?

Not “How do I push through this?”
Not “How do I forgive?”
Not “How do I get rid of the anger?”

But:

What has to be in place for my nervous system to feel pain without needing to defend itself?

That question changed everything.

Because trauma isn’t just about what happened.
It’s about what wasn’t safe to feel at the time — and what still doesn’t feel safe now.

A very ordinary metaphor: the tea urn

What finally made this click for me wasn’t a clinical model. It was something far more ordinary.

A tea urn.

If you’ve ever been in a church hall, conference, or village event in England, you know the kind. A large metal urn full of hot water. People pour water in. People draw water out. Nobody expects the urn to decide what gets poured into it.

That turns out to be an important truth.

You don’t fully control the inflow

Life pours things into us:

  • grief,
  • loss,
  • betrayal,
  • stress,
  • memories,
  • moments that activate older wounds.

You can influence your environment, but you can’t fully control what gets poured in — and trauma makes this worse, because some of the inflow is internal. Memories, associations, bodily reactions arrive without asking permission.

Trauma isn’t caused by what goes in.

Trauma is caused by what had nowhere to go.

Why courage is required at the start

If your life is chaotic — and trauma often leaves it that way — then building safety doesn’t happen automatically.

At the beginning, courage is required to:

  • stop dissociating,
  • stop blaming,
  • stop outsourcing regulation,
  • acknowledge the truth of what hurt you,
  • accept responsibility for your own healing.

That courage is not optional. Without it, the urn is never addressed at all — it just spills onto others.

But courage has a limited role.

Courage is fuel for initiation, not a sustainable operating system.

Capacity matters more than bravery

If an urn keeps overflowing, the solution is not:

  • to shame the urn,
  • to demand it “cope better,”
  • to rely on willpower.

The solution is obvious and practical:

You get a bigger urn.

A bigger urn means:

  • more safety,
  • more order,
  • more predictability,
  • more rest,
  • more margin than feels strictly necessary.

This isn’t indulgence.
It’s honest load management.

For someone carrying trauma, the full load is never fully predictable. Some pain only activates under certain conditions. Some surfaces only once safety increases. Some waits until the system finally believes it won’t be punished for feeling.

Which leads to a counterintuitive truth:

There is no such thing as “too much safety.”

Not because you’re weak — but because you’re being realistic.

The tap matters just as much as the urn

An urn without a tap will always overflow, no matter how large it is.

The tap represents regulated release:

  • tears,
  • prayer,
  • walking,
  • music,
  • writing,
  • talking,
  • silence,
  • being seen without being fixed.

You don’t open the tap all the way.
You open it enough.

That’s regulation.

Not flooding.
Not repression.
Flow.

Problems arise when:

  • the urn is too small,
  • the inflow spikes unexpectedly,
  • or the tap is blocked by judgment, busyness, or pressure to “be over it.”

That’s when pain spills over — into anger, illness, numbness, compulsion, or collapse.

Two layers of safety — and one constant

Seen clearly, safety has two layers.

1. In-the-moment psychological safety (always required)

This is non-negotiable at every stage.

It’s the sense that:

  • nothing bad will happen if you feel this,
  • you won’t judge yourself,
  • you don’t have to act, decide, forgive, or explain,
  • you can feel something and then stop.

Without this, courage becomes self-harm.

2. Structural or environmental safety (increases over time)

This is about the context of your life:

  • order and predictability,
  • clean, self-respecting spaces,
  • time buffers,
  • relationships without performance pressure,
  • rhythms that don’t live at the edge.

This layer grows as courage does its early work and confidence replaces it.

This safety doesn’t process pain directly —
it increases the size of the urn.

Why this isn’t avoidance

Avoidance tries to stop water being poured in.

Safety-building accepts that water will come — and prepares for it.

Avoidance shrinks life to avoid feeling.
Safety enlarges life so feeling doesn’t destroy you.

Those are opposites.

A safe environment isn’t one where nothing hurts.
It’s one where nothing bad happens because you hurt.

Anger, forgiveness, and timing

Anger isn’t the enemy. It’s a protector — a response to hurt that wasn’t safe to feel.

Trying to eliminate anger before safety exists just creates anger at anger. A loop.

And forgiveness — especially in Christian settings — is often misunderstood.

Forgiveness is not:

  • emotional warmth,
  • reconciliation,
  • trust,
  • pretending something didn’t matter.

At its core, forgiveness is a decision about debt, not a demand about feeling.

Forgiveness without safety isn’t virtue — it’s coercion.

Timing matters.

What actually heals trauma

Trauma isn’t healed by heroics.
It isn’t healed by insight alone.
It isn’t healed by courage sustained beyond its role.

Trauma is healed by a system that learns, slowly and reliably:

No matter what gets poured in,
the urn can hold it —
and the tap will open.

Courage gets you to the point where that system can be built.

Safety is what allows the body to trust it.

And one day you notice the pain hasn’t disappeared —
but it fits.

And that, I’ve learned, is what healing actually looks like.

​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) Ontology — v0.8

AMS Ontology v0.8 — Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (Self-referencing, structured, and vocabulary-sealed. Uses “first/second heavens” for runtime reality and “third heaven” for creation-level domain. Avoids “universe”.) 0. Purpose and Reader Contract This document defines the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) as a unified ontological framework for runtime physical reality: matter, fields, energy, waves, circuits, and life-as-process. It is written to be: Self-referencing: terms are defined once and referenced consistently. Layered: it distinguishes creation-level constraint (T0) from runtime topology (T1/T2). Guardrailed: it forbids category errors (especially “order ⇒ agency” and “organisation ⇒ new energy”). This ontology does not attempt to model: ensoulment, spiritual state change, or personhood instantiation divine agency, the Holy Spirit, or theological mechanisms creation-level acts beyond their runtime implications (Those topics can be acknowledged in appendice...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more