The Bacterial Flagellar Motor, Vorton Slip, and Lossless Motion

The Bacterial Flagellar Motor, Vorton Slip, and Lossless Motion

An AMS-Based Interpretation of Biological Torque and Superconducting Current

Abstract

The bacterial flagellar motor exhibits mechanical rotation with near-unity efficiency, rapid directional reversal, and minimal energy dissipation. Conventional thermodynamic and electromechanical interpretations describe this behavior as unusually efficient energy conversion. This article proposes an alternative interpretation using the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) ontology, in which motion arises from controlled reconfiguration of a continuous torsional substrate rather than from energy conversion in the classical sense. The flagellar motor is analyzed alongside superconducting current flow, revealing both systems as geometric variants of the same underlying mechanism: lossless vorton slip under coherent boundary conditions.

1. Observed Properties of the Flagellar Motor

Experimentally established properties of the bacterial flagellar motor include:

  • Direct coupling between ion flow and torque generation
  • Rotational speeds up to ~18,000 RPM under low load
  • Sustained rotation at 200–1,000 RPM under high load
  • Near-100% energy conversion efficiency
  • Instantaneous directional reversal
  • Mechanical clutching without significant dissipation

Notably, the motor does not exhibit the characteristic losses associated with thermal cycling, resistive heating, or stochastic molecular collisions expected at this scale.

2. Limits of Conventional Interpretation

Standard biochemical and electromechanical models describe the motor as converting electrochemical potential into mechanical work. While descriptively accurate, this framing encounters conceptual difficulty:

  • It predicts unavoidable dissipation at molecular scale
  • It offers no natural explanation for instantaneous reversal
  • It treats ions as energetic “fuel” rather than control variables
  • It relies on statistical averaging to suppress expected noise

These tensions suggest that the dominant process may not be energy conversion, but structural reconfiguration.

3. AMS Framework Overview

Within the AMS ontology:

  • Physical systems emerge from a continuous torsional substrate
  • Stable matter corresponds to topologically bound torsion (vortons)
  • Motion arises from coherent phase migration of torsion
  • Dissipation occurs only when topological coherence breaks down

Under this view, efficiency is not achieved by reducing losses, but by avoiding dissipative mechanisms entirely.

4. Flagellar Motor as Rotational Vorton Slip

Reinterpreted in AMS terms:

  • The ion gradient establishes a torsional bias in the substrate
  • Stator proteins act as phase gates constraining torsional alignment
  • The rotor corresponds to a bound torsional node
  • Rotation is the cyclic migration of torsion around a closed geometry

Torque is not produced by force transfer between components, but by sustained release of torsional tension along a permitted rotational path.

5. Direction Reversal and Mechanical Clutching

Small conformational changes in motor proteins alter the chirality of the torsional boundary condition. This flips the direction of torsional migration without requiring deceleration or re-acceleration of mass.

Similarly, clutch proteins do not interrupt energy supply; they modify topological coupling, allowing torsion to bypass the rotor entirely while remaining present in the substrate.

6. Comparison with Superconducting Current Flow

Superconductors display analogous properties:

  • Persistent current without applied voltage
  • Zero resistive loss
  • Sensitivity to phase coherence and defects
  • Failure only under topological disruption

In AMS terms, superconducting current is linear vorton slip constrained by lattice coherence, whereas the flagellar motor is rotational vorton slip constrained by protein geometry.

7. Unified Interpretation

Both systems exhibit:

  • Motion without classical energy conversion
  • Dependence on coherence rather than force
  • Dissipation only upon phase decoherence
  • Control via boundary condition modulation

The difference lies solely in geometry: translational versus rotational.

8. Implications

This interpretation suggests that biological and superconducting systems operate within the same physical regime, differentiated by structural constraints rather than fundamental principles. Efficiency emerges naturally when motion is expressed as coherent torsional reconfiguration rather than particle transport.

Conclusion

The bacterial flagellar motor and superconducting current flow represent two expressions of the same underlying AMS process. Both demonstrate that lossless motion is not exceptional when systems operate through controlled torsional coherence rather than energetic conversion. This reframing aligns observed efficiencies with physical necessity rather than biological or material anomaly.

​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) Ontology — v0.8

AMS Ontology v0.8 — Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (Self-referencing, structured, and vocabulary-sealed. Uses “first/second heavens” for runtime reality and “third heaven” for creation-level domain. Avoids “universe”.) 0. Purpose and Reader Contract This document defines the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) as a unified ontological framework for runtime physical reality: matter, fields, energy, waves, circuits, and life-as-process. It is written to be: Self-referencing: terms are defined once and referenced consistently. Layered: it distinguishes creation-level constraint (T0) from runtime topology (T1/T2). Guardrailed: it forbids category errors (especially “order ⇒ agency” and “organisation ⇒ new energy”). This ontology does not attempt to model: ensoulment, spiritual state change, or personhood instantiation divine agency, the Holy Spirit, or theological mechanisms creation-level acts beyond their runtime implications (Those topics can be acknowledged in appendice...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more