The Timing of Healing and Output Cycles (A Real-World Baseline)

The Timing of Healing and Output Cycles (A Real-World Baseline)

In my previous post, I described a cycle I’ve observed in my own life:

  • Healing
  • Integration
  • Expression
  • Consolidation

I won’t re-explain the phases in full here — the earlier post does that properly.

This post is about something more practical:

How long these phases actually took for me, in real life.

Because one of the easiest ways to get discouraged is to assume healing will be neat, symmetrical, and predictable.

It usually isn’t.

And if you’re trying to spot your own pattern, it helps to have at least one real-world anecdote from someone else.

The Four Phases (Very Brief Reminder)

Just to anchor the meaning:

  • Healing = internal repair and emotional unburdening
  • Integration = practising the new patterns in real life
  • Expression = external output, contribution, building
  • Consolidation = stabilising, maintaining, and normalising

If you want the deeper explanation, refer back to the earlier post on the full cycle.

My First “Measured” Cycle (Approximate Timings)

This is the first time I’ve been able to observe this cycle consciously enough to estimate the timings.

It’s not scientific.

It’s not a rigid rule.

But it’s a baseline.

Phase 1 — Healing: ~6 to 8 weeks

This was the longest phase.

It involved:

  • deep emotional processing
  • nervous system repair
  • regaining clarity
  • restoring boundaries
  • metabolising grief, anger, fear, and confusion

In hindsight, it makes sense that this phase was longest, because the backlog was largest.

Phase 2 — Integration: ~4 to 6 weeks

This phase was harder to “see” clearly, because it blended into healing.

The transition was gradual.

But it was there.

Integration looked like:

  • testing boundaries in real situations
  • resisting old compulsions
  • staying stable while emotions rose and fell
  • learning not to collapse back into carrying other people

The most important feature of this transition was:

I didn’t collapse.

It was seamless enough that I barely noticed it happening.

And that, for me, was a major milestone.

Phase 3 — Expression: ~2 weeks

This was surprisingly short.

But extremely intense.

This is where output surged:

  • writing
  • structuring
  • publishing
  • producing work that felt meaningful and purposeful

This phase felt like “flow” in the strong sense:

not forced, not planned, but almost opened up.

Phase 4 — Consolidation: ~1 to 2 weeks

This was the phase of:

  • stabilising after output
  • returning to normal rhythms
  • maintaining rather than accelerating
  • recovering energy

And then I found myself returning to another healing phase again.

The Cycle as a Whole (How It Looked)

If I compress it into one line:

Healing (6–8w) → Integration (4–6w) → Expression (2w) → Consolidation (1–2w) → back to Healing

So the cycle was not evenly distributed.

It was heavily front-loaded.

And that’s the point.

What This Means (And Why It’s Encouraging)

If you’re in a long healing phase right now, it may not mean you’re stuck.

It may mean:

  • you’re doing the heavy internal work first
  • you’re clearing backlog
  • you’re building a foundation strong enough to carry later output

In other words:

you’re doing the expensive work upfront.

And the later phases may be shorter at first.

That isn’t failure.

That’s how cycles often begin.

Why It Probably Rebalances Over Time

My expectation is that as healing progresses across multiple cycles:

  • Healing becomes less dominant (less backlog each time)
  • Integration becomes smoother (new patterns become default)
  • Expression becomes more sustainable (less surge, more steady flow)
  • Consolidation becomes normal life (not a short recovery window)

But I also expect something else:

Sometimes one cycle will hit something deeper.

A more painful layer.

A more difficult truth.

And in those cases, the healing phase may expand again.

Not because you’re going backwards.

But because you found a deeper layer worth healing.

A Warning Against “Perfect Timelines”

One of the most damaging expectations people carry is this:

“If I do healing properly, it will be predictable.”

But healing isn’t a factory schedule.

It isn’t:

  • one month of healing
  • one month of integration
  • one month of output
  • one month of consolidation
  • repeat forever

That “tickety-boo” model is comforting…

…but it’s not how real inner change usually works.

Real change is often:

  • uneven
  • front-loaded
  • nonlinear
  • responsive to what life triggers next

So if your pattern doesn’t look tidy, you’re not doing it wrong.

You’re doing it like a human being.

The One Practical Question That Helps Me Most

When I’m unsure what phase I’m in, I ask:

Am I creating from freedom… or from compulsion?

  • If it’s freedom → build
  • If it’s compulsion → slow down, regulate, return to healing

That one question has helped me avoid turning output into a substitute for safety.

Final Thought

If you’re reading this and you’re in a season where healing feels long and output feels small:

You may not be failing.

You may be laying foundations.

And if you’ve never been able to see your healing process in phases before, you’re not alone.

I’ve been “peeling the onion” for years.

This is simply the first time I’ve been able to describe the cycle clearly enough to observe its timing.

And that clarity alone is progress.

Because once you can see the pattern…

you stop panicking when the seasons change.

​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

AMS Guide Part 1 — Charter and Purpose

AMS Guide Part 1 — Charter and Purpose 1. What This Guide Is This document is a companion guide to the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) Ontology . Its purpose is to: explain the ontology in plain but accurate language reduce cognitive load for readers encountering the ideas for the first time provide intuition, metaphors, and narrative scaffolding allow readers to grasp what the ontology is doing without needing to adopt its formal vocabulary immediately The guide is not the ontology itself. It does not replace formal definitions or axioms. It exists to make them understandable . 2. Intended Audience Primary Audience Readers with: a genuine interest in science and how the physical world works some familiarity with scientific ideas and language curiosity rather than professional obligation A good mental model is: A regular reader of a BBC science magazine, Scientific American–style articles, or long-form popular science writing. This reader: is not a practi...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more