Aetheric Magnetic Substrate Whitepaper

The Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS):

A Unified Substrate Ontology for Physics

Author: Graham Ellsmore, ChatGPT

Status: Speculative / Ontological Framework

Abstract

This paper proposes a unified physical ontology in which all known phenomena
— matter, electricity, magnetism, light, time, gravity, and quantum behavior —
emerge from a continuous, tension-bearing substrate termed the
Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS).

The framework does not reject existing mathematics or experimental results,
but reinterprets them as emergent descriptions of substrate dynamics.

1. Core Claims

  1. Magnetism is primary geometry, not a force.
  2. Matter consists of stable topological knots (vortons) in AMS.
  3. Energy is a state of substrate tension, not a stored substance.
  4. Light is propagating torsional disturbance.
  5. Electricity is substrate tension reconfiguration in closed topology.
  6. Time is emergent from reconfiguration rate.
  7. Gravity is large-scale curvature of AMS toward dense knot regions.

2. Motivation

Modern physics predicts outcomes accurately but lacks explanatory unity.
Multiple “fundamental” forces, particles, and exceptions coexist uneasily.

The AMS framework seeks:

  • Ontological parsimony
  • Geometric causality
  • Explanatory continuity

3. Relation to Existing Theories

Overlaps:

  • Maxwellian field equations
  • General Relativity predictions
  • Quantum threshold behavior
  • Topological soliton models

Divergences:

  • No particles as fundamental
  • No energy substance
  • No spacetime as entity
  • No probabilistic ontology

4. Novel Contributions

  • Magnetism as static torsional equilibrium
  • Unified explanation of AC/DC behavior
  • Resistance as substrate impedance
  • Heat as chaotic micro-torsion
  • Time as emergent, not fundamental

5. Falsifiability

The framework is falsifiable if:

  • Substrate-independent energy storage is demonstrated
  • Time variation is observed without reconfiguration change
  • Magnetic monopoles exist as isolated sources

6. Limitations

  • Currently qualitative in places
  • Requires formal tensor formulation
  • Requires experimental discrimination from standard interpretations

7. Conclusion

The AMS framework offers a coherent ontological reinterpretation
of physics that restores explanatory meaning without discarding
empirical success.

It invites critique, extension, and formalization — not belief.

Acknowledgements

This work draws inspiration from classical field theory,
topological physics, and metaphysical realism.

​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits The following descriptions assume: The Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) is a continuous tension-bearing medium. Matter consists of vorton lattices embedded in AMS. A battery imposes a sustained AMS tension gradient between its terminals. “Current” is the rate of coordinated vorton slip/reconfiguration events that allow AMS tension to relax through a material path. Time is described in conceptual frames, not absolute units. 1) Battery + Resistor (DC) Frame 0 — Battery alone Inside the battery, chemical processes maintain a persistent torsional imbalance in the AMS. One terminal enforces higher AMS tension; the other enforces lower tension. No external relaxation path exists yet. Frame 1 — Circuit closed The conductor connects the two boundary conditions. The AMS immediately attempts to equalize tension along the conductor path. A longitudinal AMS tension gradient establishes itself almost instantaneously along the wir...
Read more