AMS Use Cases

Time in AMS Terms (including “time changes with altitude”)

1) What “time” is in AMS

In the AMS ontology, “time” is not a substance or a background river. It is:

  • the rate at which stable structures (vortons, atoms, clocks) can complete their internal cycles,
  • governed by local AMS conditions: tension, curvature gradient, and torsional activity.

A “clock tick” is a repeatable physical cycle (atomic transition, oscillation, resonance) whose pace depends on how the local AMS constrains that cycle.

2) Why altitude changes clock rates (phenomenology first)

Empirically, clocks at higher altitude run slightly faster than clocks lower down (all else equal). This is a tested effect, measurable even at small height differences with modern clocks. 

It is also consistent with older large-scale tests using aircraft-carried clocks and gravitational redshift experiments.

3) AMS explanation of “higher altitude = faster”

Translate the usual “gravitational potential” story into AMS language:

  • Near a massive body, the AMS is in a stronger tension-gradient / curvature condition.
  • That condition slightly increases the “constraint load” on repeating micro-processes (the cycles that define a clock tick).
  • As you go higher, that local constraint lessens (the AMS gradient is a bit weaker), so the same kind of oscillatory process can complete its cycle slightly more freely → the clock runs faster.

So the mechanism in AMS terms is:

  • clock rate = (internal cycle dynamics) × (local AMS constraint)
  • altitude changes local AMS constraint
  • therefore altitude changes clock rate

4) What this means conceptually

  • “Time dilation” is not time itself changing as a mystical entity.
  • It is the rate of physical processes changing because their substrate constraints change.

This also gives an intuitive reason why high-precision clocks “see” the effect:

  • they are exquisitely sensitive probes of the AMS constraint field. 
​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits The following descriptions assume: The Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) is a continuous tension-bearing medium. Matter consists of vorton lattices embedded in AMS. A battery imposes a sustained AMS tension gradient between its terminals. “Current” is the rate of coordinated vorton slip/reconfiguration events that allow AMS tension to relax through a material path. Time is described in conceptual frames, not absolute units. 1) Battery + Resistor (DC) Frame 0 — Battery alone Inside the battery, chemical processes maintain a persistent torsional imbalance in the AMS. One terminal enforces higher AMS tension; the other enforces lower tension. No external relaxation path exists yet. Frame 1 — Circuit closed The conductor connects the two boundary conditions. The AMS immediately attempts to equalize tension along the conductor path. A longitudinal AMS tension gradient establishes itself almost instantaneously along the wir...
Read more