Reinterpreting Relativity in AMS Terms

Reinterpreting Relativity in AMS Terms

1. Thesis

Relativistic effects are reinterpreted as changes in physical process rates and measurement outcomes caused by local AMS constraints (tension, torsion, curvature gradient), rather than as properties of an abstract spacetime manifold.

2. Operational Starting Point

All time and length measurements reduce to:

  • counts of repeating physical cycles (clocks),
  • and comparisons of propagated signals (often optical/EM in conventional language).

In AMS terms, these are:

  • cyclic reconfiguration rates of stable vorton structures,
  • and propagation of torsional disturbances through the substrate.

3. Kinematic Time Dilation (motion-related)

When a clock is in sustained motion relative to a chosen reference environment, its internal cycles must continuously reconcile with:

  • ongoing substrate reconfiguration demands associated with maintaining that motion through the AMS.

Result:

  • the clock’s internal cycle completion rate is reduced compared with a clock not undergoing that sustained constraint.
    This maps onto the observed “moving clocks run slow” effect (phenomenology acknowledged; ontology differs).

4. Gravitational Time Dilation (altitude/field-related)

A stronger AMS tension-gradient environment imposes greater constraints on cycle completion rates.
Therefore:

  • clocks deeper in the gradient tick slower;
  • clocks higher in the gradient tick faster.
    This corresponds to tested altitude-dependent clock-rate shifts. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

5. Light Propagation and “c”

In AMS, the characteristic propagation speed of small torsional disturbances is a substrate property (a limiting response speed of the medium).
Thus “c” is:

  • not a magical number about “light-as-a-thing,”
    but a constraint on how quickly the AMS can update and transmit disturbances.

6. Length Contraction (measurement-side)

If rulers and clocks are made of vorton structures whose equilibrium configurations depend on AMS constraints, then motion through or constraint changes in the AMS will alter:

  • equilibrium spacing of bound structures (rulers),
  • cycle periods (clocks),
    and hence alter measured lengths and times in a coupled way.

7. Practical payoff

Relativity becomes:

  • a theory of how substrate constraints alter the behaviour of matter-built measurement devices and signals,
    with the same empirical targets but different metaphysical commitments.
​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits The following descriptions assume: The Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) is a continuous tension-bearing medium. Matter consists of vorton lattices embedded in AMS. A battery imposes a sustained AMS tension gradient between its terminals. “Current” is the rate of coordinated vorton slip/reconfiguration events that allow AMS tension to relax through a material path. Time is described in conceptual frames, not absolute units. 1) Battery + Resistor (DC) Frame 0 — Battery alone Inside the battery, chemical processes maintain a persistent torsional imbalance in the AMS. One terminal enforces higher AMS tension; the other enforces lower tension. No external relaxation path exists yet. Frame 1 — Circuit closed The conductor connects the two boundary conditions. The AMS immediately attempts to equalize tension along the conductor path. A longitudinal AMS tension gradient establishes itself almost instantaneously along the wir...
Read more