Cosmology + Quantum Uncertainty in AMS

Cosmology + Quantum Uncertainty in AMS, and What Already Exists in Prior Theories

A) Cosmology in AMS terms (sketch)

1) Expansion-like observations:

  • Recast as large-scale evolution of AMS tension/curvature, changing how torsional disturbances propagate over long baselines.
  • “Redshift” becomes an accumulated substrate effect (a gradual retuning of disturbance periodicity) rather than requiring an ontological commitment to any one narrative; empirical mapping is the key task.

2) Structure formation:

  • Matter (vorton clusters) forms where AMS geometry supports stable knotting; large-scale gradients guide where stable structures accrete.

3) Background radiation / pervasive noise:

  • Naturally interpreted as a ubiquitous low-level spectrum of AMS micro-torsion (a “thermal” substrate bath).

(These are hypothesis-level statements; the success criterion is quantitative fit to observations.)

B) Quantum uncertainty in AMS terms

Uncertainty is reframed as a combination of:
1) Under-resolved substrate degrees of freedom:

  • A measurement accesses only coarse-grained aspects of AMS state + vorton configuration.

2) Thresholded reconfiguration:

  • Detectors respond when local substrate + matter conditions cross reconfiguration thresholds.
  • Small untracked variations in AMS microstate shift when/where threshold crossings occur.

3) Contextual coupling:

  • The “measurement setup” is literally a different boundary condition on AMS, so outcomes depend on the whole configuration.

Thus “probability” is epistemic (about what we can track), while the substrate dynamics can remain ontologically real.

C) How much of this already exists?

Pieces of your AMS framework rhyme with multiple existing lines of thought:

1) Field-first realism (mainstream-adjacent):

  • Physics already treats electromagnetism as a field with dynamics; AMS is a stronger ontological commitment: the “field” is a real substrate with mechanical-like torsion modes.

2) Aether revivals (historical + modern):

  • Various “Lorentzian aether” viewpoints keep an underlying medium while reproducing relativistic effects operationally.
  • Your AMS differs by making magnetism/geometry primary and using knot ontology for matter.

3) Topological matter ideas:

  • There are long-standing programs where particles emerge as topological defects/knots in underlying fields.
  • Your “vorton as knot” sits in that family, but your unification target is broader (electricity, magnetism, gravity, thermodynamics, and measurement theory under one substrate).

4) Stochastic / hidden-variable instincts:

  • Many interpretations of quantum mechanics attempt to relocate “randomness” into hidden dynamics or contextuality.
  • AMS uncertainty as “untracked substrate degrees of freedom + thresholds” is aligned with that instinct, though your mechanism is distinct.

D) What seems new to me

  • The specific unification: “magnetism as static torsional equilibrium,” “electricity as directional AMS reconfiguration with vorton slip,” “light as torsional disturbance,” “heat as chaotic micro-torsion,” and “time rate as local AMS constraint” — in one coherent ontology with a common vocabulary.
  • The insistence on metaphysical humility + operational definitions as the front-end discipline.
​

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Validation vs. Valuation

Validation vs. Valuation I recently found myself reflecting on the difference between validation and valuation , and I realised that although the words are often used interchangeably, they point to very different things. Validation, at its simplest and most innocent, is a form of support in the moment. It says: you’re seen , you’re heard , you’re not alone right now . In practical terms, validation is important — we validate work to ensure it’s safe, correct, or fit for purpose. In relationships, it can be reassuring and kind. But validation has a shadow side. When validation becomes something I need in order to feel whole — when my sense of self depends on it — it quietly shifts from support into something corrosive. In its more sinister form, validation can become manipulation, or an inadvertent tapping into a core wound: without your approval, I don’t exist . At that point, validation no longer supports identity — it erodes it. Valuation is something else entirely. Valuation ...
Read more

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate

Newton, Einstein, and Gravity Revisited Through the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate I recently watched a video titled “There Is Something Faster Than Light.” The specifics of the argument aren’t the point here. What caught my attention was the familiar framing that followed: Newton versus Einstein, non-local versus local gravity, classical intuition versus modern physics. This framing is common. It’s also misleading. What follows is not a critique of either Newton or Einstein, but an attempt to understand what they were actually observing , why their descriptions differed, and how those observations can be unified under a single, coherent ontology — the Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) . Newton: Gravity as Non-Local Action Newton’s law of gravitation is often caricatured as “action at a distance,” and historically, Newton himself was uneasy with that implication. From a modern perspective, Newtonian gravity is described as non-local : Two masses influence one another instantly N...
Read more

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits

Frame-by-Frame AMS Narratives of Basic Circuits The following descriptions assume: The Aetheric Magnetic Substrate (AMS) is a continuous tension-bearing medium. Matter consists of vorton lattices embedded in AMS. A battery imposes a sustained AMS tension gradient between its terminals. “Current” is the rate of coordinated vorton slip/reconfiguration events that allow AMS tension to relax through a material path. Time is described in conceptual frames, not absolute units. 1) Battery + Resistor (DC) Frame 0 — Battery alone Inside the battery, chemical processes maintain a persistent torsional imbalance in the AMS. One terminal enforces higher AMS tension; the other enforces lower tension. No external relaxation path exists yet. Frame 1 — Circuit closed The conductor connects the two boundary conditions. The AMS immediately attempts to equalize tension along the conductor path. A longitudinal AMS tension gradient establishes itself almost instantaneously along the wir...
Read more